WTC7 Squibs

Look again. No sign of collapse when that row of vertical explosions happened. Nothing from above had fallen into push that air out. If our country had been decent, I would be glad to admit it.

Look again. There is, at the moment of that vertical row of bursting windows, NO collapsing yet. They broke before the actual collapse. They were explosions. Nothing had fallen from above to push the air out at that point.

The firefighters didn't "know " the building was going to collapse. They were called out of the building so they could "pull" it. One weakened truss does not a collapsed building make. That is just nonsense. There was lots of noise around and the squibs were quite high and inside the building. Not surprising that there is no audible of them.

@FunkyGranny9 LOL!

those are window blinds going up as the building goes down.

witnesses heard & felt explosions. you don't always get bright flashes especially if the explosions are at the core columns. journalof911studies com ae911truth org for scientific,& sourced articles by real scientist who are not afraid to put their names on their work. Why do the debunkers hide their names & qualifications??

Yes, if a building collapses the air below it dissapears into oblivion. These 'squibs' are nothing more than air finding an escape route. Besides, if it WAS a controlled demolition, where are the LOUD explosions? Where are the BRIGHT flashes? Those who ignore answers to THEIR OWN quesions are ignorant, stubborn, and refuse to admit their OWN country is being decent and TELLING THE TRUTH! w w w(dot)loosechangeguide(dot)com

Logically, what other possible explanation is there for these visible squibs? It's certainly not due to the fire, dozens of storys below. It's not machinegun gfire. What is it? Doesn't it warrant any sort of investigation? Many believe it does.

The evidence of demolition is right there, as clear as day, literally. To deny it, or to somehow demand more "proof" demonstrates either your complicity, blindness, or affrontive, perpetual denial of reality. All you have to do is suspect foul play rather than joyously embrace our (or any) government, bungling and proven liars over and over again throughout all of history.

2 seconds of blurry images is supposed to PROVE the government did this? amazing how desperate u idiots get.

the whole world is being taken for a ride, it is SO fucked up. all in the name of greed. evil is defintaly a foot. if karma doesn't exist then these bastards are getting away with it all

For the sake of argument, let's say that NO debris hit WTC7. Would anyone pay MORE attention to those who say that it was brought down with additional explosives? No, supporters of the Official Conspiracy Theory would still insist that it fell due to internal fires. Anyone watching WTC7 come down intuitively realizes that the building is not collapsing due to damage from fires or impact. Seeing the top-most 20+ floors falling as a single, monolithic unit is believing.

Are you aware of what our government has done with the "missing" two trillion dollars (Rumsfeld's statement on 9/10/01)? Are you aware of our military capabilities? I suspect that the answer to both of those questions is "No". No rule says that WTC7 had to be visibly damaged by debris from the collapsing towers before it could be brought down. And the method by which it was destroyed is still unknown. We only posit demolition charges because that is the only method WE THE PEOPLE know about.

Where was the building collapsing? At the bottom. The upper 20+ stories of the WTC7 fell as a "unit", with NO relative movement between the floors. Yes, you would expect a puff of dust if the floors were collapsing onto each other and compressing the air, but these floors were moving as a monolithic unit. The squibs are present despite the fact that the floors they are appearing on are NOT moving toward each other. Case closed.