Comments
-
Demolition experts will tell you that jet fuel cannot get hot enough to melt steel. So, that is impossible for the plane to have caused the collapse of the builidings. A plane did not hit tower seven and yet it collapsed. No one can say that is was from the shaking of the ground from the two towers. In that case, the other buildings surrounding it would have fallen. It just kills me that people will denounce something because they do not want to believe it took place.
-
Molten Aluminum is silver, not red. Air being compressed in a football sized area is not gonna cause ejections such as those shown, nor be localized to a few windows. There ARE many videos and audio spectrums disproving your assertion of no *booms*. This one for example /watch?v=MDSGm2jhdA0 And I really suggest u watch all the parts of this one. /watch?v=Xu_aH-bXR_k Spread the truth, not government propaganda. "Condemnation without Investigation is the height of Ignorance" - Albert Einstein
-
CLEAR DEMOLITION!!! What can we do have them investigate this? 3,000 people died! This was the reason we went into IRAQ.. All lies...We need to find out the truth..
-
Yeah, have a look through......the flashes are on there. If you can get the cnn news footage from youtube or any source - you will see them now!
-
Nicely done. Excellent examples & comparisons. The flashes were totally on with what ive seen of WTC7 footage, but i must say, i dont recall seeing actual 'flashes' in WTC 1 & 2 footage B4?? Lateral ejection of debris, early squib debris blowouts, & the dripping molten Fe, yes. Actual flashes, cant say i have, til Ur clip here that is. Some looked like paper, others were unmistakable. Im gonna have to go review all my collected footage and determine why i havent seen them til now. Thanks again.
-
While i agree i dont recall seeing flashes B4, other than WTC7, I must inform U all ur other assertions R INCORRECT! Please get properly informed & then help others get informed by visiting AE911Truth,org. Over 1,600 Architechs & Engineers, a collective experience of over 25,000 years, using actual science, publishing unrefuted PEER reviewed papers, & with ACTUAL physical evidence. AE911Truth,org/en/evidence.html "Condemnation without Investigation is the height of Ignorance" - Albert Einstein
-
Excellent work!
-
nice lesson...for all demolition company,,the terorrist gave you a fast way to demolish building nice and quick without any several weeks or months preparation..just crash a plane on it..i guarantee you,,it will falls exactly where it stands..ROTFLMFAO
-
if you look closely you can see debris falling off the building with the sparks.. especially around the initial free falling area.
-
Yeah this video explains it all and if bush really cared why stay at the school if it was me I would of tryed to do something about it. Also we raise the questions that if the plane hit the pentagon why was their remains of the plane? Plus if they say that it was the jet fuel then their chatting shit cuz that mount of jet fuel carnt go through that amount of steel and the tower would of fall side ways !!!!!
-
@DaveTheTurd Not added a single thing in to this video.....other than text.
-
@roquefortfiles , No Evidence due to the Goverment doing a 'quick' cleanup afterwards illegaly sending it to China for disposal.
-
How do you know that the sparks shown in this video were not electricity sparks from the building?
-
Actually buidling seven wasn't hit by an aircraft. One collapse maybe, two collapses unlikely, but a third with no aircraft hit is just plain bogus. The video is well done and illustrates the point completely. Those towers have 'controlled demolition' written all over it. As for wire and caps and evidence...military and thermate technology has moved on. For why the US Administration allowed this to occur just title search "My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism".
-
All this video proves is that truthers don't have the slightest clue of how controlled demolitions actually work.
-
@cybertron74 You are right.
-
@Gazeboman Baaaaaaa Baaaaaaaaa what is plausible then 2 planes took down 3 buildings for the first time in human history?
-
@roquefortfiles theres more evidence of this crazy "conspiracy" than there is to support the official story
-
@roquefortfiles Because it was highly advanced obviously, anyone whot hinks that was a natural collapse is a flat out retard
-
From the day it happened I just couldn't believe that the buildings had fallen the way they did. I've always suspected something was going on besides the plane hitting it that would have made them fall. However on the other hand it seems extremely improbable that someone could have rigged all of the explosives required. It's a mystery. I wish I was a billionaire, because I would build a replica of the WTC and then fly a fully fueled 767 into it. That would settle this debate once and for all
9m 48sLength
READ THIS ALL = A video that compares aspects of well known, 'obvious' building demolitions with the almost hidden ones of WTC 1 & 2 on September 11th 2001. I say almost because ANYONE can watch this video and see it for themselves. OBVIOUSLY there is paper and glass mixed in during the collapse there BUT there are also cutter charges visable. See many of the demolition charge flashes before and during the implosions of the towers. Watch as huge horizontal blasts eject steel and concrete far below the collapsing section. Its clear cut folks....those towers were absolutely laced with demo charges, fact. And that creates all sorts of horrible thoughts.... We must expose the 9/11 Inside Job...for the victims, their families, subsequent war deaths and for everyone on this planet. Thanks to the video "9/11: The Explosive Reality".